Ken is still allowing people to write “Wilber is one of the most highly regarded philosophers today”. By whom? A select group in the US. I can assure you that Wilber is hardly known here in Oz, let alone the rest of the world, and if he is known it more as a New Age pseudo-philosopher. You can pick up any book by genuinely well-regarded modern philosophers and find no reference to Wilber.
- So why allow this obvious lie to be printed?
- Does Wilber think that serious people don’t understand the difference between hype and genuine credibility?
- Now if Ken wants to be taken seriously and to avoid the New Age tag, then why does he do this regular gig with Cohen in a magazine that carries ads for a range of dubious teachers and products?