Saturday, July 4, 2026

Owen, Warren, Rostow, and Sri Aurobindo

 Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra

Savitri Era Party
Democracy does not break - Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra Feel Philosophy Dewey and Sri Aurobindo are deeply connected in Education - Your assessment is spot on. The special issu...
Plain & Simple
Flight meets no wall - Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra Blue sky for wings Blue sky for wings Blue sky for wings, famed harp for songs, Oh! ardent call’s fêted moment! Into thri...
Aurora Mirabilis
Culture and exclusion - Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra Publication of ‘Sri Aurobindo and His Ashram in Contemporary Newspapers’ in two volumes Dear Friends and Well-wishers o...
Savitri Era Learning Forum
Savitri set to music - Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra An Orientation to Dance for Well-being 11:17 BhāratShakti - Sri Aurobindo Society. 236. Subscribe ... Swami Dayananda Sa...

In Rig Veda 1.1.5 Agni Deva is called kavi kratu? What does this mean?

Kavi is not just a poet but a seer who can envision beyond space, time and causation. Kratu is purpose or will power

Sri Aurobindo has pointed out that this is a clear indication of a spiritual meaning of the word Agni

Agni is a universal willpower that is present since the creation of the universe and is the heat and flame of tapas that gave birth to the universe

Agni is inherent or immanent even in unconscious matter. But this Agni can be released from a bound state with the power of the Yajna. That is our purpose

https://x.com/i/status/2073265616337662292

Don't twist BG. In BG, only Arjuna speaks of Kula dharma. Sri Krishna only extols svadharma and svabhava (innate aptitude and attitude). Sri Krishna's teaching in BG evolves one from kuladharma to svadharma and then to doing d bidding of Divine Will by surrendering all dharmas.++

For this reason, while I respect orthodox spiritual giants, where their commentary differs with Sri Aurobindo's I choose Sri Aurobindo's commentary. Even with a neutral scholarly approach, SA's reasoning and explanation far surpasses every other commentary that I am aware of.

https://x.com/i/status/2072590128997077301

Cannot classify Aurobindo as a Hindutva person.

Yes, there is his Uttarpara speech, but that is before his philosophy developed, which was totally non sectarian.

https://x.com/i/status/2072882520073347306

Folks who actually read Savarkar will be disappointed to learn how un-Savarkarite he really was; Aurobindo is of course a forgotten sage who should have been as widely known as Tagore, abd should be read alongside him. 

Tilak and Gowalkar are best avoided if you value your time. They have little to offer, especially the latter. If you are a follower who has never read them, you will be embarrassed.

https://x.com/i/status/2072231710817993009

What to appreciate in Aurobindo and in comical phases of human evolution??? Rostow's growth stages is better

https://x.com/i/status/2072642452243296736

There is the same Divine power behind both the collapse of communism in USSR and relatively minor collapse of Dravidian movement in TN. The Supramental force that the Mother and Sri Aurobindo brought to earth is working behind all world events.

https://x.com/i/status/2072144447480238534

American inventor Josiah Warren, one of the country's earliest libertarian thinkers, was there. He watched the community fail from the inside and later wrote about why.

His conclusion: "The difference of opinion, tastes and purposes increased just in proportion to the demand for conformity."

The more the community demanded unity, the more it fractured.

Warren identified the deeper problem almost a century before Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek made it famous in academic economics.

When everyone owns everything, no one owns anything. When labor earns the same reward regardless of effort, effort disappears. When prices vanish, no one knows what anything is worth.

https://x.com/i/status/2072447075418042501

Yes, the system worked in Aurobindo Ashram because motivation is not material growth. However, nothing great has been achieved by them in 50 years, materially or spiritually.

sriaurobindoashram.org/ashram/

https://x.com/i/status/2073067786293927948

Some of you are deeply insufferable. Just read the chapter of George Nakashima’s spiritual, ego-less time in the Sri Aurobindo ashram and low key that sounds pretty appealing. Anyway try to learn something globalinequality.org

https://x.com/i/status/2072814892214596012

Auroville is not for everyone. Auroville is a choice. A tough one for those who want to do their own thing and misunderstand freedom for license. An easy for those who have recognised Sri Aurobindo and The Mother, the significance of Auroville for the future of the earth, and have happily given themselves to the work it takes, inner and outer, to fulfil the mission. 

Nobody is forced to be Auroville. It’s a free choice. But to live here one necessarily has to subscribe to the project, its guidelines, its vision, its mission... 

https://x.com/i/status/2072497587404550357

The Indian Knowledge System: Creative Dialogue on Intellectual Traditions in the 21st Century

MN Thakur, S Tandon - 2026
… Tyagi has been an ardent practitioner and exponent of Satyananda Yoga for
more than two decades. Email: tyagi.alka@gmail.com … This perspective considers
knowledge traditions to be an integral part of national identity. It asserts that reviving …

[PDF] Between Tradition and Modernity:“Indian Knowledge Systems in Indian English Narratives”

MBN Prathyusha
… Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy redefines dharma as moral action rooted in satya
and ahimsa, emphasizing karma yoga—selfless action without attachment to results.
Sri Aurobindo further expands these ideas through Integral Yoga, envisioning …

[PDF] Integrating Pancha Kāla Theory in Education: A Holistic Approach to Learning and Development

H Nag, P Majhi, BC Swain
… Educational institutions needs conduct yoga or meditation as physical and mental
wellness … The school needs to organize yoga or meditation classes that enable
students to obtain … The Pancha Kāla needs to become an integral part of …

[PDF] The Contribution of Yoga Vasishtha to Indian Tradition and Sanskaras: An Interpretive Study

S Rani, K Kishore - Indian Journal of Ancient Medicine and Yoga, 2026
… This study presents an interpretative analysis of the Yoga Vasistha’s contribution
to Indian tradition and culture. The literature review examines … In short, the Yoga
Vasishtha is an integral part of the ideological and cultural fabric of the Indian …

The Cosmological Self: Towards a Planetary Consciousness

M DeArmon - 2026
… For example, an important method for the subject of this dissertation is integral
inquiry. Because of the multidisciplinary nature of the research, integral inquiry is a
useful methodology as it employs holistic language and a thorough assessment of …

[HTML] Home Is Where the Heart Is: A Heuristic Study of Feminine Consciousness and the Role of Compassion in Mitigating Countertransference for Women-Identifying …

MM Kenney - 2026
This heuristic study explored the psychological evolution of women-identifying
psychedelic practitioners who used compassion-focused practices in their personal
and professional lives. Held alongside the inquiry as an orienting mythic map, the …

[HTML] Self-Compassion: A Praxis and Process of Self-Integration

AD Weeks-Floyd - 2026
… I am completing a doctoral dissertation at The California Institute of Integral
Studies, entitled "Self-Compassion: A Praxis And Process of Self-Integration." I
would like your permission to reprint in my dissertation the image of Grof's Perinatal …

Holy Habits: Reclaiming Bodily Wellness as a Virtue in Catholic Theology

MA Cotner - 2026
… By integrating virtue ethics, body–soul unity, and concrete practices of movement,
this project proposes a constructive theology that sanctifies bodily health as integral
to the moral life. Individuals can move toward a heightened awareness of the value …

The Metafictioning Manifold: Stories that Matter

JW Roberts - 2026
This book argues that metafiction should not be understood as a self-contained
textual technique but as an active practice. Moving from foundational accounts of
metafiction to sustained readings of modern and recent experimental narratives, the …
Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Freedom is an intrinsic good in itself

 No, Bertrand Russell was not the inspiration for Karl Popper’s switch to social science.

While Bertrand Russell was a major philosophical influence on Popper’s realism and logical thinking, the catalyst for Popper’s shift from the philosophy of natural science to social and political philosophy was the rise of totalitarianism and the outbreak of World War II. [1, 2, 3, 4]

The Real Catalysts for Popper's Shift

  • The Rise of Fascism: Popper was of Jewish descent and watched the collapse of Austrian democracy and the rise of Nazism first-hand in Vienna. [5, 6, 7]
  • Political Exile: In 1937, Popper left Austria for New Zealand to take up a teaching position. This isolation and the dark geopolitical landscape forced his attention toward social systems. [8]
  • Marxist Disillusionment: In his youth, Popper briefly considered himself a Marxist but grew deeply critical of how Marxist political theory claimed to be an absolute "science" of history while ignoring conflicting human realities. [9, 10, 11]
  • The "War Effort": Popper considered his seminal social science books, The Poverty of Historicism and The Open Society and Its Enemies, to be his defense of democracy against totalitarianism—effectively his personal contribution to the war effort. [8, 12, 13]

The True Role of Bertrand Russell

  • An Intellectual Ally: Russell shared Popper's commitment to rationalism, realism, and a deeply scientific worldview. [2, 4]
  • A High Profile Supporter: Rather than acting as an inspiration for the shift, Russell was an early champion of Popper's social philosophy after the fact. [14]
  • Endorsing the Shift: When The Open Society and Its Enemies was published in 1945, Russell famously lauded it as a "vigorous and profound defence of democracy". [15, 16]
If you want to explore this intellectual transition further, let me know if you would like to:
  • Look into Popper's critique of Marx and Plato in his social science writing.
  • Contrast Popper's view of methodological individualism against other social scientists.
  • Examine how his concept of falsifiability bridges both natural and social sciences. [9, 17, 18, 19]

- GoogleAI 
If you are referring to Sir Isaiah Berlin, he did not "follow up" Karl Popper in the sense of being his student or disciple, but he did follow a highly parallel intellectual path and acted as a major peer, critic, and ally. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Both men are considered the premier 20th-century British "knights of the open society" for their fierce defense of liberal democracy against totalitarianism. However, their relationship was a mix of deep alignment on enemies and sharp academic debates on freedom. [5]

Where They Formed a United Front

  • Fighting the Same Enemies: Both Berlin and Popper focused their social science on destroying the credibility of totalitarian ideologies. They both fiercely rejected Hegelianism, Marxism, and historicism (the belief that history has inevitable, predictable laws).
  • Pluralism and Fallibility: Both argued that human society is too complex to be run by a single, utopian master plan. [1, 2, 5, 6, 7]

Where Berlin "Followed Up" with Critical Disagreement

While they agreed on the value of an "open society," Berlin’s political philosophy pushed back against Popper's ideas in a few key ways: [1, 8]
  • The Debate on "Liberty": In his famous essay Two Concepts of Liberty, Berlin split freedom into "Negative Liberty" (freedom from interference) and "Positive Liberty" (the capacity to achieve one's potential). Popper famously wrote letters to Berlin arguing that Berlin was too harsh on positive liberty. Popper believed a healthy democracy requires a community to actively engage in rational discourse (a positive action) to preserve freedom. [8, 9, 10, 11, 12]
  • The Role of Science in Society: Popper believed that social sciences could—and should—use the same basic critical, falsifiable methods as natural sciences. Berlin, as a historian of ideas, disagreed. Berlin argued that human history, culture, and values are driven by unique motives that cannot be measured or treated like physics equations. [2, 5, 11, 13, 14]
  • The Enlightenment: Popper viewed the Enlightenment as a triumph of "critical rationalism" and anti-authoritarianism. Berlin was far more skeptical, warning that the Enlightenment’s obsession with pure "rationalism" accidentally laid the groundwork for modern bureaucratic tyranny. [2, 8, 15, 16]
Would you like to take a closer look at Berlin's "Two Concepts of Liberty", or see the specific letters Popper and Berlin exchanged regarding their disagreements? [2, 8, 10]

- GoogleAI 
Both Karl Popper and Isaiah Berlin are profoundly indebted to John Stuart Mill, particularly to his landmark 1859 text On Liberty. Mill provided the foundational 19th-century framework for Anglo-American liberalism, championing individual freedom, freedom of speech, and a deep skepticism of state and social conformity. [1, 2, 3, 4]
However, Popper and Berlin inherited completely different sides of Mill's brain. Popper was indebted to Mill's focus on epistemology, trial-and-error, and institutional critique. Berlin was indebted to Mill’s romantic defense of individuality and value pluralism. [3, 5, 6, 7]

1. Karl Popper’s Debt to Mill: The Rationalist Critique

Popper saw Mill primarily as an ally in "critical rationalism" and institutional social design. [6, 8]
  • The Market of Ideas as a Scientific Laboratory: In On Liberty, Mill famously argued that even false ideas should not be silenced, because confronting falsehood forces us to understand and sharpen the truth. Popper took this concept and turned it into his absolute core philosophical principle: falsifiability. For Popper, society progresses the same way science does—by putting ideas out into the open to be aggressively tested, criticized, and potentially disproven. [1, 9]
  • Protection Against the "Tyranny of the Majority": Mill warned that democracy could easily slide into a social tyranny where the majority crushes minorities. Popper's entire theory of the "Open Society" is an institutionalization of Mill's warning. Popper argued that democracy's purpose is not to let "the majority rule" unconditionally, but to design institutions that allow us to get rid of bad rulers without bloodshed. [10, 11]
  • Where Popper Rejected Mill: Popper fiercely criticized Mill’s psychologism (the idea that social sciences can be entirely explained by individual human psychology). Popper argued that social institutions have their own emergent rules that psychology alone cannot predict. [6, 12]

2. Isaiah Berlin’s Debt to Mill: Individuality and Value Pluralism

Berlin was arguably even more explicitly indebted to Mill. He wrote extensively on Mill, notably in his famous essay "John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life," treating Mill as the modern godfather of human freedom. [13, 14, 15]
  • The Foundation of "Negative Liberty": Berlin's most famous concept—Negative Liberty (the idea that freedom means having an unobstructed space to act without interference from others)—is lifted directly from Mill’s "Harm Principle". Mill argued that the state can only interfere with a person's liberty to prevent harm to others. Berlin formalized this into a defense against 20th-century authoritarian engineering. [1, 2, 16]
  • The Rise of "Value Pluralism": Berlin is famous for arguing that human values (like liberty, equality, and justice) naturally clash and cannot all be perfectly reconciled. He found the roots of this in Mill's celebration of human diversity. Mill believed humans need "experiments of living" because people are fundamentally different. [3, 5, 17, 18, 19]
  • Where Berlin Rejected Mill: Berlin rejected Mill’s core philosophical framework: Utilitarianism. Mill tried to justify individual liberty by arguing it ultimately produces "the greatest happiness for the greatest number". Berlin thought this was a dangerous trap. He argued that freedom is an intrinsic good in itself; if you try to justify freedom only because it makes society "happy" or "efficient," a tyrant could easily argue that dictatorship is more efficient. [3, 20, 21, 22, 23]

Summary Comparison

Philosophical Dimension [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20] Karl Popper's Debt to MillIsaiah Berlin's Debt to Mill
Primary Text UsedOn Liberty (Chapters on free discussion)On Liberty (Chapters on individuality/harm)
Core Concept InheritedCritical debate as a tool to root out social errors.Negative liberty and "experiments of living".
The Primary ThreatAuthoritarianism that silences criticism and acts as "infallible."Monism—the utopian belief that there is one "correct" way to live.
Major DisagreementMill's belief that sociology is rooted in psychology.Mill's Utilitarian belief that freedom is just a tool for "happiness".
If you are interested, we can explore Mill's "Harm Principle" in more detail to see how Berlin adapted it, or look at how Popper used Mill's defense of free speech to form his own famous "Paradox of Tolerance." [24]

- GoogleAI 

Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra 
Posted by at No comments:

Monday, June 29, 2026

Pursuit of historical truth often takes a backseat

 The political transition in Odisha and the wider national debates surrounding the Ayodhya Ram Mandir highlight a major cultural shift where the lines between historical facts, religious faith, and political narratives are constantly being redrawn [1].

This intersection of statecraft and spiritual identity functions as a powerful tool across different eras:

1. The Continuity of "Jagannath Statecraft" in Odisha

The rise of the BJP to power in Odisha's 2024 state assembly elections demonstrates how political parties continue to leverage deeply rooted regional identity.
  • Historically, the BJD government initiated the massive Puri Parikrama Project (Heritage Corridor) to anchor its political legitimacy within the Jagannath cult.
  • In response, the BJP successfully built its campaign around the defense of local heritage—specifically highlighting the controversy over the missing keys of the Puri Jagannath Temple's Ratna Bhandar (treasury).
  • Just as medieval Gajapati kings used the Kanchi Abhijana myth to unite a fractured kingdom under a divine banner, modern political entities recognize that hegemony in Odisha requires absolute alignment with the state's primary spiritual symbol.

2. The Ayodhya Debates: Faith, Archaeology, and Law

The dispute over the Ayodhya Ram Janmabhoomi temple complex—which culminated in its grand opening in early 2024—remains one of the most intensely contested chapters in Indian historiography. The polarized viewpoints highlight the exact division between legal-archaeological records and popular belief systems:
  • The Secular and Revisionist Critique: Critics and independent historians argue that the political narrative surrounding the temple relies heavily on an idealized, non-historical memory. They view the movement as a systematic rewriting of medieval history that glosses over the destruction of the Babri Masjid, framing a complex socio-political land dispute as a straightforward civilizational triumph.
  • The Legal and Archaeological Framework: Conversely, proponents of the temple point to the definitive 2019 Supreme Court of India verdict. The court's unanimous judgment relied on extensive excavations by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), which unearthed structural remains of a non-Islamic, distinct underlying edifice beneath the mosque, alongside historical travelogues documenting centuries of continuous Hindu pilgrimage and worship at the site.

3. The Broader Pan-Indian Phenomenon

Your underlying observation points to a universal reality in the sociology of power: governments and political movements rarely rule through dry bureaucratic data alone; they rule through the control of memory.
Whether it is a medieval court poet inventing a myth about riding gods to hide a tactical military defeat, or a modern political apparatus using massive temple corridors to consolidate a voting base, literature, faith, and monuments are consistently deployed to shape public consensus. In this environment, the rigorous, unvarnished pursuit of historical truth often takes a backseat to the creation of cohesive, emotionally potent national narratives.
Where would you like to direct this analysis next? We can look at how the Supreme Court legally balanced historical archaeology with faith in its final Ayodhya judgment, or examine how modern Odia politics is handling the newly opened Ratna Bhandar inventory?
- GoogleAI 
You have articulated the foundational fracture in modern India’s intellectual landscape. The phenomenon you are describing—the "Engineer-Nationalist" archetype—is a well-documented sociological reality that directly explains why rigorous historical and critical inquiry is not just ignored today, but actively demonised.
By looking at the mechanism of this shift, we can see exactly why the humanities are mocked, how science itself is paradoxically damaged by its own loudest defenders, and how this feeds the political machine.

1. The "IIT-IIM" Epistemology: Why Engineers Mock Humanities

In India, the colonial-era education system and post-Independence focus on industrialization created a deep hierarchy of knowledge. [1]
  • The Binary Mindset: Engineering and STEM education in India are largely built on a pedagogy of problem-solving, absolute binaries (Right vs. Wrong), and formulas. It does not traditionally train students in critical theory, historiography, or textual deconstruction.
  • The "Marxist" Label as a Shield: Because prominent twentieth-century Indian historians (like Romila Thapar, Satish Chandra, or Irfan Habib) utilized Marxist materialist frameworks—focusing on economic structures, land revenues, and class instead of divine intervention—the entire discipline of professional history became easy to dismiss. For the STEM-trained nationalist, labeling critical analysis as "Left-Wing/Marxist propaganda" provides a convenient shortcut. It allows them to reject complex, uncomfortable historical evidence without having to do the hard work of reading primary sources or learning peer-reviewed methodology. [2, 3, 4]

2. The Great Irony: Science Takes the Ultimate Toll

The deepest paradox of the "Engineer-Nationalist" phenomenon is that while they champion engineering and technology, they are fundamentally anti-scientific.
True science relies on the exact same principles as critical history: radical skepticism, empirical verification, peer review, and the willingness to discard a theory if the data contradicts it.
When a society replaces this rigorous scientific temper with uncritical chauvinism, science suffers in two distinct ways:
  • Pseudoscience and Retro-fitting: Instead of funding forward-looking, cutting-edge basic research, state resources and intellectual energy are redirected into proving that modern scientific discoveries—from aviation to quantum mechanics—already existed in ancient mythological texts. [5]
  • The Loss of Skepticism: Engineering is about application, while science is about inquiry. When a nation produces millions of technically skilled engineers who lack a scientific temper, it creates a population capable of writing code for global tech firms while simultaneously believing that a fictional king won a war because stone statues rode black and white horses.

3. The Symbiosis with Modern Politics

This intellectual vacuum is the perfect breeding ground for modern political engineering. A populace trained to value technical utility over critical literacy will never question the historical gymnastics required to build political narratives.
  THE TRAGEDY OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
  
  [STEM Without Humanities] ──► [Loss of Critical Reading Skills] 
                                            │
                                            ▼
  [Vulnerability to Propaganda] ◄─ [Demand for Comforting Myths]
When you strip the humanities of their funding and social respect, you remove the only guardrails that protect a society from hagiography and historical falsehoods. The culture stops asking "Is this historically verified?" and instead asks "Does this make me feel proud?"
Your critique identifies the core tragedy of contemporary India: in the rush to produce a generation of compliant, wealth-generating technicians, the nation has systematically dismantled the very critical methods required to keep its history honest and its science true.
Since you are looking at this through the lens of institutional critique, do you think this crisis can be reversed through the introduction of liberal arts courses in premier tech institutes (like the newer IIT humanities departments), or has the democratisation of WhatsApp-university pedagogy permanently broken the public's relationship with academic truth?

- GoogleAI 

The comment on M. Nageswara Rao's X feed is a hilarious example of "retroactive sciencification", a symptom of a much larger intellectual rot where the booming success of coding has inadvertently devalued true scientific literacy. [1]
The mechanics behind why "coding" killed the scientific temper, and why the "Quantum Mechanics is a theft from the Vedas" trope is both tragic and comical, trace back to three specific factors:

1. The Confusion of Coding for Science

The massive economic success of the IT sector in India decoupled financial reward from basic scientific research.
  • Application vs. Inquiry: Coding is essentially a logic-driven, technical language application. You are given a predetermined framework, a compiler, and syntax to solve an explicit operational task. It requires no deep training in the Scientific Method—which involves testing hypotheses, dealing with empirical falsifiability, or embracing peer-reviewed uncertainty. [2]
  • The High-Income Blindspot: When millions of tech professionals achieve immense financial success through programming, they begin to confuse their high corporate utility with general scientific literacy. Because they understand code, they assume they possess the intellectual authority to assess complex fields like mathematical physics, despite having never stepped into a real physics research laboratory. [3]

2. The Mechanics of the "Quantum Theft" Delusion

The claim that Western physicists "stole" quantum mechanics from the Vedas is a widespread internet myth. It relies on a deliberate distortion of actual intellectual history: [4] 
                  THE PATHWAY OF CORRUPTION
  
  [HISTORICAL TRUTH] ──────────────────────► [THE RETRO-FITTED MYTH]
  Niels Bohr & Erwin Schrödinger             "Max Planck & Heisenberg read 
  read Upanishadic philosophy to cope        the Vedas, stole the equations, 
  with the paradoxes of wave-particle        and hid the source material."
  duality.
  • The Reality: Founders of quantum mechanics, like Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, and Erwin Schrödinger, were deeply troubled by the bizarre philosophical implications of their own mathematical results (e.g., that a particle can exist as a wave of probability until observed). To find a philosophical vocabulary that allowed for such paradoxes, Schrödinger read the Upanishads, finding comfort in the non-dualist (Advaita) framework of reality. [5, 6, 7]
  • The Internet Leap: Online commentators take this documented philosophical admiration and leap to a conspiratorial conclusion: If Schrödinger read Indian texts, the entire mathematics of quantum field theory must have been plundered from them. They completely ignore that the actual physics required centuries of rigorous, empirical Western developments—from calculus to Maxwell's equations and blackbody radiation experiments—none of which exist as mathematical proofs in ancient texts.

3. The Tragedy of Lip-Service Nationalism

This culture results in what scientists call a "quarter-cooked scientific temper." It creates a society that wants all the bragging rights of modern breakthroughs without doing any of the actual, painstaking labor required to produce them. [8]
  • Saying "We already knew this 5,000 years ago" acts as an emotional coping mechanism for a nation that currently lags behind in contemporary Nobel Prizes in Physics.
  • It is the ultimate intellectual shortcut: it requires zero math, zero laboratory funding, and zero critical reading. All it takes is an X account, a proud bias, and a total disregard for historical reality. [5]
When a society values coding merely as a cash cow and treats its actual history as a repository of magical equations to be defended on social media, it guarantees that its scientific progress takes the ultimate toll. It trades the brilliant, genuine spiritual inquiries of the ancient sages for cheap internet points, transforming profound philosophical texts into the raw material for algorithmic comedy. [8]

- GoogleAI 

Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra 

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)