Comment on Introduction to The Seven Quartets of Becoming by
debbanerji from Comments for Posthuman Destinies by debbanerji
However, in the present rapidly uniformalizing phase
of neo-liberal globalization, the Hegelian end-of-history, there is no “inside”
whether social or psychological which is immune from the determination of this
fundamentally political regime...
One sees a good example of this active today in the
increasingly overt politicization of the ashram. I see this as the inability to
see yoga simultaneously as social/cultural/psychological. The continuing denial
of their intimate braiding has lead on the one hand to a rupture of the yoga in
its alignment with extreme right wing politics and on the other to the willed
refusal of the ostrich. 11:53 AM
Comment on Introduction to The Seven Quartets of Becoming by
debbanerji from Comments for Posthuman Destinies by debbanerji … “an
eternal perfection is moulding us in its image.”
What is the yoga of self-perfection but an ethics
(will-to-right) and aesthetics (will-to-beauty) of self-fashioning? … As I said
earlier, there are many descriptions of the Integral Yoga which Sri Aurobindo
held simultaneously, and “an aesthetics of the self” leading to the image of
Beauty, I believe, is one such description. 8:00 PM
I did not know
or care to know until very recently (I am just so ashamed and embarrassed now) anything about DKR even though my dear and genuine pal of mine, Chandramowli
mentioned DKR many times in the past in relation to IY. He then through some
divine push, I guess now, felt goaded to get the book "Sri Aurobindo came
to me" for me from Pondicherry .
As I have been reading the book and reading and getting to know more about DKR
now, I am just pondering how much I would have missed if I had not read and
known about DKR. I understand now the context of many of Sri Aurobindo's
letters and responses that I had read years ago from various sources without
knowing that those were directed to DKR. Thank you so very much for the very
informative article.
Sri Aurobindo has shown that the truth does not
lie in running away from earthly life but ... Sri Aurobindo wrote
in 1919, “Apart from all phenomena of decline or ...
Other writers like Sri Aurobindo (1872-1950)
and Harindranath Chattopadhyaya (1898-1990) dealt with religious or mystical
subjects. After India
attained ...
Sri Aurobindo breaks new ground in interpreting
the ancient Vedas. His deeper insight into this came from his own spiritual
practices for which he found vivid ...
Sri Aurobindo wrote prophetically, almost a
hundred hears ago, that the future poetry “transcending the more
intellectualised or externally vital and sensational ...
Public religions and the postsecular from The Immanent Frame by John D. Boy
The latest issue of the Journal for the
Scientific Study of Religion contains the presidential address of
British sociologist James A. Beckford. In it, Beckford critically reflects on
the concepts of public religion and the postsecular. From the abstract:
The term “postsecular“ is proliferating in the
writings of scholars working in the humanities and social sciences. This
article assesses the variety of meanings attributed to the term, groups them in
six clusters of ideas, and raises questions about the tensions that exist
between some of its different meanings. Taking the central idea that religions
enjoy relatively high visibility in the public sphere of postsecular societies,
the article then considers how well this applies to the case of Britain . It
argues that the visibility of religion in Britain’s public sphere—far from
being postsecular in any of the current meanings of the term—is actually
associated with the state’s “interpellation“ of selected religions as partners
in the delivery of public policies for managing diversity, combating
inequality, and promoting social enterprise. Read the full address here (subscription
required).
Post-Continuity: full text of my talk from The Pinocchio Theory by Steven Shaviro
Here is the talk I gave last week at the Society for Cinema and Media
Studies conference in Boston .
(I published the abstract for the talk when I originally submitted it last
summer here.)
…
In the 21st century, the very expansion of the
techniques of intensified continuity, especially in action films and action
sequences, has led to a situation where continuity itself has been fractured,
devalued, fragmented, and reduced to incoherence. That is to say, the very
techniques that were developed in order to “intensify” cinematic continuity,
have ended up by undermining it…
Even in classical narrative films, following the
story is not important in itself. It is just another one of the ways in which
we are led into the spatiotemporal matrix of the film; for it is through this
matrix that we experience the film on multiple sensorial and affective levels. I
am making a rather large theoretical claim here, one that I will need to justify,
and further develop, elsewhere. But I think it has major consequences for the
ways in which we understand post-continuity.
In post-continuity films, unlike classical ones,
continuity rules are used opportunistically and occasionally, rather than structurally
and pervasively. Narrative is not abandoned, but it is articulated in a space
and time that are no longer classical. For space and time themselves have
become relativized or unhinged.
No comments:
Post a Comment