From aurosatya vrata to "Tusar N. Mohapatra" email@example.com date 21 October 2010 17:38 subject Reg. Mr. Sunil SR's message on SEOF dt. October 21 2010
Dear Mr. Mohapatra,
Best Greetings after a long pause. May I please request you to post my message on your blog site in response to Mr. Sunil SR's message. Please also remove my e-mail address while posting, as is the practice currently.
Dear Mr. Sunil SR,
As someone who has taken part in some of the discussions that took place on the Savitri Era Open Forum (SEOF) earlier this year during the months of March - May '10, I would like to bring to your attention that there is nothing original or new that you are presenting to the readers of the SEOF.
I do not know if you are a newcomer to the SEOF or if you are posing as someone else who is merely reappearing on this blog site every time there is a controversy that needs to be stirred up, but we are already all too familiar with the stale stories that you are presenting here.
Not only are your stories and information stale, but we have already discussed, demonstrated and established that much of the allegations that you are exposing here are totally inaccurate and unsubstantiated. And more importantly they appear to be motivated misrepresentations of facts and lies.
In particular, what is objectionable is the fact that you are misusing the Mother's words to insult respectable people such as Dr. Nirodbaran and Mr. K.D. Sethna (Amal Kiran) who were among the few disciples that were close to Sri Aurobindo.
Several people have already contributed and presented sufficient material on this blog site to clearly establish that it is not only inappropriate, but that it is inaccurate to claim that the Mother considered Dr. Nirodbaran and Mr. K.D. Sethna to be morons.
If you think that they were morons, just say so, but do not misuse the Mother's words or put your words in Her mouth to try and prove your petty points.
In case you are not convinced of my observations, I earnestly invite you to request Mr. Tusar Mohapatra, the owner and moderator of this blog site to direct you to the SEOF archives (hoping that the word "archives" doesn't intimidate you) so that you may review the discussion that took place earlier this year, during March - May '10.
I would also request you to avoid getting into any lengthy and repetitive arguments until you have studied that archived material. And if you do get back, I hope that you will agree that it will be more meaningful if you stick to specifics and substantiate your claims and allegations with something more concrete and convincing that merely presenting your opinions. Regards, S.