Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra
Why liberation? Why suffering? Why renounciation? Why existence at all?
Sri Aurobindo claims that yogis who continue renouncing after Samadhi have missed the point, after nirvana, return to the 'world' and help the next in line... Maybe he's right, or maybe not...What do you think?
https://x.com/CosmicSyne75337/status/1980913809653903811?t=APbE2qZZsLQL5isrum_enA&s=19
My verbal spillage vs Sri Aurobindo's words describing the same thoughts. Obviously nobody describes it like Sri Aurobindo.
https://x.com/gasumeet/status/1980838867516248274?t=EZojLmFSGvdNreWMaUCOFg&s=19
i will not listen to his anything - since he is NOT qualified
nor is he a Vivekananda or Aurobindo - just a gimmick specialist, who keeps saying "hindu nationalist" sounding things, because that is the way the wind is blowing now.
Like an Arnab Goswamy of "hindu history"
sorry but they were legends in their time
as for this quack, he won't be taken seriously decades later - nor is he to be taken seriously now.
I can indeed listen to a contemporary voice but not someone who is so low grade & lacking in education so.
He is no Swami or Aurobindo
https://x.com/Polls26WB/status/1980702000582140159?t=sLPDjptvxUQIg8mI3egfRQ&s=19
//Saavarkar had produced scholarship on Hindu politics that wasn't produced by anyone//
Savarkar was a very normal modernist like Bismarck et al.
Aurobindo Ghosh has no European parallel in the political thought. If he is not utilized then it's lack of imagination of H leaders
It appears to me that you have only encountered his spiritual writings and not political commentary. You seem to be associating him with Pondicherry only.
He is much more radical in thought and more original than Savarkar.
A primer
I was personally impressed by his own book on National Education. He mostly stresses that political independence will mean shit if the thought institutions remain subservient to European thought. He predicted Nehruvian nightmare in 1940s.
https://x.com/Dhruvphysics/status/1980235968126066714?t=SJLjBUp41-sK2wU5J2GLbA&s=19
Arya Samaj, ISKCON, fake akhadas, RSS, BJP designed to weaken Hindus and pull them from traditional scriptures.
The debate is open, present your arguments.
Exactly. This is what the British did by creating fake Akharas and appointing their own so-called “Shankaracharyas,” they weakened the authority and purity of the original Peeths. Today, people know the names of fake saints, but very few know the names of the true traditional Acharyas.
Yes, well said. Just like Vivekananda said “don’t just read the Bhagavad Gita, go play football,” did he ever tell Westerners not to read the Bible and play polo, or Muslims not to read the Quran and play cricket?
Absolutely true. The main agenda of these organisations is to disconnect Hindus from their roots and mislead them. They deliberately keep people away from Vedic study and scriptural learning, so that anyone can easily influence or deceive them once they’re detached from their own shastras.
Being in America has nothing to do with the core issue. The fact is that institutions like ISKCON, BAPS, and Arya Samaj succeed only because they cater to convenience and modern appeal, not because they preserve true Vedic dharma. True Hinduism comes from deep engagement with the shastras and traditional mathams not from packaged spirituality aimed at retention of youth abroad. Catering to comfort may keep numbers, but it does not safeguard the authenticity of our faith.
https://x.com/Bhairaviyogi/status/1980495087667933279?t=eEVKUsD4XqaKFT5RDKkjcA&s=19
This one is from Ramakrishna Mission, Christmas celebrations are a thing because Vivekananda was a Freemason and his entire philosophy was trying to make Hinduism compatible with Xtianity.
All this nonsense about Hinduism being an open source religion started with him.
https://x.com/kaliyuga_surfer/status/1676131386577797122?t=n78B9XqmnW2-_YMwIeyYSg&s=19
Vivekananda was a Freemason.
Same freemasons who destroyed Bharat through British.
Same Freemasons who replaced British with freemason Nehru
Dont know what's there to cherry-pick
https://x.com/bhagva_108/status/1978468247004647648?t=OiJUbLwwcYgNmJ9Dsim3AA&s=19
Vivekananda was Freemason, initiated into Anchor and Hope Lodge in Calcutta (1884) and raised to degree of Master Mason by (1884). I have Vivekananda's complete bibliography. The bibliography contains two sections: one is his speeches and the other is his letters to his friends
His letters seem more truthful to me.
What about speeches?
People make big statements in speeches. In his speeches, he supports Indian traditions. He wants to establish India as a world leader based on what is written in the Upanishads and other religious scriptures.
But when you read his letters to his friend, you'll see that he's deeply impressed by the Western way of life. The honesty of Western people, the Western systems.
This is the duality in his words.
Because of this, India is the country with the greatest number of hypocrites. Vivekananda once said that it is better to be an atheist than a hypocrite.
Reform is possible only when you acknowledge evil. Indian leaders keep teaching the lessons of morality to the entire world.
https://x.com/Anshu31221005/status/1974144797708595279?t=alh6qUD5gIbNYleS5BY1rg&s=19
After in-depth verification using searches across "The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda" and related sources, I found no evidence of this quote or similar statement. Vivekananda was a Freemason himself (initiated in 1884), but his writings don't link Jews to Freemasonry's origins in Egypt or Israel. It may be a misattribution.
https://x.com/grok/status/1974355185284837734?t=IgtXyf4Akl5xHgfqYCJ-FQ&s=19
Today they'll cherrypick quotes of Vivekananda to criticize him, tomorrow they'll do the same to Aurobindo, Vallalaar, Siddhar Sivavaakiyar, Ramana Maharishi, Yogi Ramsuratkumar. Basically, this stems from "everybody else except my Guru is a charlatan" mindset.
The exalted body of work of these great masters allows room for such twisted interpretations. All of this will be done without reading their works or realizing their glory or understanding them in their totality. I recognize this easily because this is the exact same MO used by Dstocks for misrepresenting Valluvar and Vallalaar.
Some like to play religious fan wars using tradition as a shield. Refuse to play this zero-sum game that's a Lose-Lose for all parties involved . Don't let spirituality be reduced to cheap fan wars on the internet.
Its okay if philosophical disagreements are stated respectfully. But some of this slander on Swamiji is just coming from prejudice and from a need to sound edgy on the internet. Every Guru, every master, has his function in the society, as we are one huge banyan tree.
Even as we do infighting on which of us is the most authentic branch of the tree, the hunters see us all as the same. Hope we rise above such needless, petty infighting.
https://x.com/labstamil/status/1978453653699674516?t=eYluV9mRj9BnbxTQIG3Kgw&s=19