- Manoj
Das Gupta Stops Sudha Sinha’s Hindi Classes
- No
Food for Togo Mukherjee
- Auroville
Working Committee Stops Sraddhalu Ranade...
- Dr. Gayatri Resigns from the Ashram Nursing Home
-
You do have a one track approach - @SavitriEraParty: This tweet owes its existence as much to technology as to the legal rights won over centuries. The content, of course, is force of the wo...4 days ago
-
People operate with diverse systems of belief and we can live with this incoherence - Political Theology: Four New Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty - Page 118 - Paul W. Kahn - 2011 - Preview - More editions In the postmodern world, the...1 month ago
Savitri Era of those who adore, Om Sri Aurobindo and The Mother.
In view of the fact that multiple anonymous comments in a thread make confusing reading and it becomes difficult to track who is telling what and to whom, only comments bearing some name/pseudonym/identity will appear in future. [TNM 011110 SEOF]
Sunday 18 March 2012
Reducing religious belief to the ethical
Manoj
Das Gupta Stops Sudha Sinha’s Hindi Classes Posted by General Editor at 3/18/2012 12:30:00 PM
[On the 14th of March 2012, Manoj
Das Gupta (Managing Trustee of Sri Aurobindo Ashram) abruptly stopped Sudha
Sinha’s Hindi classes. Sudha Sinha happens to be an eminent writer in Hindi.
She has 24 books to her credit and was presented the National award for writers
in 1967. She was also nominated the best writer in the State of Bihar in 1986/1987. Her
translations of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother’s works into Hindi were greatly
appreciated by the publication department of the Ashram until she became a
petitioner in the case filed against the mismanagement of the Trustees in
August 2010. After that, her translation of Volume 4 of the Mother’s Collected
Works was cancelled at the stage of printing and she was told not to proceed
with her translation of Sri Aurobindo’s Autobiographical Notes.
If the management had been less vindictive and
thought of the larger benefit of her work to the Ashram, it certainly would not
have acted in this manner. After all, who has lost more in this battle, Sudha
Sinha or the Ashram? The Hindi speaking disciples and devotees of Sri Aurobindo
and the Mother have been deprived of excellent translations and the students
will no more have the privilege of being taught Hindi by a renowned writer.
Sudha Sinha will now get more time to write and continue with her translation
of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother’s works, whether the Trustees approve of it or
not. We publish below the two letters which she wrote recently to Manoj Das
Gupta.]
Working
Committee statement on articles by Francois Gautier Home
The Working Committee of the Residents' Assembly of
the Auroville Foundation wishes to state that it is shocked that Auroville
resident Mr. François Gauthier is publishing articles criticizing the Indian
political establishment. In doing so, Mr. Gauthier acts against one of the
basic principles of Auroville which is that residents of Auroville do not
engage in politics.
The writings of Mr. Gauthier only express his own
views and opinions and not that of any authority or of the Auroville residents.
The community of Auroville take no responsibility and cannot be held liable for
the contents of Mr. Gautier's articles and messages. Auroville, 10-12-2008
Govind - Mar
17, 2012 09:59 AM Here is the WC's "shock" at Francois Gautier's
articles:
When it comes to an outspoken person who does not
conform to the left/liberal political line then suddenly this group of
two-faced Januses is keen to remind everybody that "residents of Auroville
do not engage in politics". But in protecting one of their own gurus, this
freedom loving bunch suddenly sees no problem in wading knee-deep into Ashram
politics to suppress the freedom of others. Truly pathetic.
Govind - Mar
17, 2012 08:24 AM Here is a link to a web-page with more details on Togo
Mukherjee:
He is a truly extraordinary individual.
Lynn
Geri on From The Essence of Truth by Martin Heidegger November 1, 2011 I have
been playing with the framework.
Thill -
March 8th, 2012 on 9:12 am How can we make sense of W’s claim that in denying
that he believes in the Last Judgment, he is not necessarily contradicting
someone who believes in it?
It seems to me that we can make sense of these sorts
of claims made by W. only in terms of ascribing to him the view that religious
beliefs are not claims about reality, but express moral attitudes, evaluations
or value judgments, and prescriptions or “rules of life”.
Thus, on W.’s account, a person who believes that
God created the world is actually adopting certain moral attitudes, evaluations
or value judgments, and prescriptions on how to relate to the world, rather
than affirming any claims about how things are in reality. The meaning of a
religious judgment is its role in forming and leading to the adoption of
certain moral attitudes or dispositions, evaluations or value judgments, and
prescriptions?
I think W would see this thesis as a descriptive
claim about the meaning of religious belief. If it is a descriptive claim, then
we can examine whether it is true or false…
If W. is maintaining the thesis I ascribe to him
(The meaning of a religious judgment is its role in forming and leading to the
adoption of certain moral attitudes or dispositions, evaluations or value
judgments, and prescriptions), then he is reducing religious belief to the
ethical. And this, I think, shows that the ethical occupies a central place in
his outlook and thought. Reply
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment